安东尼Sassano

2022年11月28日

Ethereum牛安东尼Sassano和灵知的共同创始人马丁Koppelmann等这些解释后来包装Ethereum FUD (wETH)是一个内部笑话的一部分。1082年总观点新闻一个内部笑话的“破产”包装Ethereum (wETH)上周末已迫使影响力来解释这只是一个“shitpost”社区成员一样真实。wETH破产FUD(恐惧、不确定和怀疑)似乎开始在11月26日,有谣言声称wETH并不支持1:1醚(ETH)和破产。区块链开发人员和贡献者erc - 721标准令牌“cygaar”是第一个传播笑话,在确认之前发一帖,它实际上是一个“shitpost”,看谁在读他的内容。这是一个测试,看谁读我的内容。事实上,仅仅一天前,cygaar推,“WETH不能走破产”,“总是会WETH可切换与乙1:1。“Ethereum牛和主机的日常Gwei安东尼Sassano也加入了wETH笑话自己的模仿邮报》11月27日,但后来不得不澄清说,最初的职位是“shitpost / meme”阅后回复。阅读回复我觉得我应该澄清这是一个shitpost / meme -与WETH没有错,你可以兑换1乙1 WETH虽然如果你不相信我我现在就买你所有的WETH 0.3乙卖给我所有你想要的然后滚蛋灵知创始人马丁Koppelmann是另一个的笑话,声称在38800年11月27日推他的Twitter追随者WETH不再是完全由乙,“我们可能会看到一个银行赎回WETH很快上运行。“几小时后,他说他希望这个笑话”没有造成太多的困惑,“链接到一个线程,解释了笑话,对于那些不知道的。我希望这个笑话没有引起太多的混乱。如果你需要更多的上下文找到:https://t。co/KDN3NvdO2z Speaking to Cointelegraph, Markus Thielen, the head of research at crypto financial services platform Matrixport has also confirmed that there is little to no truth to the WETH “shitposts.” wETH’s logic is automated by smart contracts and it isn’t controlled by a centralized entity, he explained: “I am not too concerned about WETH as it's a smart contract and not stored by a centralized exchange. Since the smart contract is open source, it can be checked for bugs or flaws.” “WBTC is completely different and here the concerns are valid,” Thielen explained. wETH is a wrapped version of ETH that is pegged at a 1:1 ratio, which aims to solve interoperability issues on Ethereum-compatible blockchains by allowing for ERC-20 tokens to be exchanged more easily. wETH was introduced as an ERC-20 token on the Ethereum network for this reason, as ETH follows different rules and thus cannot be directly traded with ERC-20 tokens. Despite the lighthearted humor behind the jokes, “Dankrad Feist” suggested to his 15,500 Twitter followers in a Nov. 27 Tweet that the comments should be marked “more clearly as jokes” as it “may not be obvious to outsiders.” A lot of people making jokes about WETH. Please be aware it may not be obvious to outsiders that it's completely different from bridged assets and there is literally almost zero risk. I think it would be better to mark these more clearly as jokes.