2023年3月20日

2023年3月20日,美国东部时间下午5:48亚马逊战斗两个新的联邦生物隐私诉讼涉及其去实体店,都是在美国纽约地方法院提起的。两者都是假定的集体诉讼。生物隐私一般情况下可能会成为一个更大的文化现象在纽约的媒体——饱和环境。最近的案例中,佩雷斯诉Amazon.com Inc .(收窄:cv - 02251)归类为440年提起民事权利(其他)情况下,3月16日在纽约南区。佩雷斯指控他的身体和棕榈被亚马逊扫描。Justia表明,原告要求999.9万美元的赔偿。第二种情况下,考尔诉Amazon.com服务有限责任公司(23 - cv - 00901 kpf),在2月递交,也在南部地区。360年人身伤害(其他)诉讼,原告律师正在寻求500万美元的损害赔偿。考尔宣称只有他的手掌扫描,根据彭博新闻分销服务。这些情况越来越普遍,已经开创了几年前在伊利诺伊州的生物识别信息隐私法。 Both teams say their clients’ right to privacy were violated under New York City laws when they visited a Go cashierless store. Both plaintiffs are suing for at least $500 per negligent scanning per class member, and the city allows them to demand up to $5,000 per violation deemed reckless or intentional. In a statement to Bloomberg an Amazon spokesperson said One, the contactless ID and payment subscription service is optional and then only at some stores. Privacy fine print is presented to enrollees when they sign up. According to the news service, Amazon wrote, “The customer is always in control of when they choose to be identified using their palm.” Perez’s filing states that had not seen, as required by the city, a sign about biometric scanning in use, and would not have entered the store if he had. As it happens, according to court documents, he did not have his palm scanned, but, according to Perez, Amazon used other sensors to create a full-body profile. Bloomberg says Go stores in March posted signs about biometric recording (a yearlong oversight, according to news publisher Business Insider), but the Perez suit claims the signs are inadequate under city law. The suit describes the signs as being “designed with colors, style and fonts that make them easier to ignore.”