2023年4月14日

ransomware后申请一年多来攻击UKG二氧化钛的私有云产品。行业获得的2023年4月14日发表照片:潜水听第四条敏这个音频是自动生成的。请让我们知道如果你有反馈。法律文件本周从工资提供者UKG建议公司在解决的过程中至少一部分工人受到诉讼的公司的2021 ransomware攻击和随后的中断。周四在一份文件在美国马萨诸塞州地区法院的律师UKG和子公司二氧化钛通知方提起集体诉讼在马塞诸斯州大学的员工纪念医疗中心,帕诉马萨诸塞大学纪念中心,等人,UKG已经同意解决加州一个单独的案件还涉及索赔基于中断。UKG周三表示,执行和解协议并释放在加州的情况下,在再保险UKG Inc .网络安全诉讼,坐落在美国加州北区地方法院。3月23日,联邦法官在加州的情况下设置一个4月28日,2023年,各方提交的最后期限运动对和解协议的初步批准。索赔由员工在再保险UKG”主张的重叠与许多帕,“UKG说在周四提交。该公司还说,它将提交一份加州帕洛法院一旦当事人协议情况下提出运动的初步批准。帕洛塔根据起诉书,马塞诸斯州大学的纪念制定了“付款冻结”为所有员工每小时停机之后,科隆诺斯私有云,UKG产品卫生系统用来进行其工资。 The freeze set wages for the pay periods that followed the outage arbitrarily to the period prior to the freeze, with limited exceptions, plaintiffs claimed. The plaintiffs alleged that UMass Memorial failed to pay them the full amount of their owed wages in a timely fashion, and that UMass Memorial and UKG’s Kronos were jointly responsible for ensuring that they were properly paid each pay period. Additionally, the plaintiffs alleged the breach gave criminals access to their personally identifiable information and that the defendants thereby put them at risk of identity theft, financial fraud and other harms. In a previous interview with HR Dive, a UMass Memorial executive confirmed that the Kronos outage left the health system disrupted its payroll and timekeeping systems for more than one month, forcing it to rely on backup timekeeping methods and duplicate the last finished payroll it had on record before services were completely restored in February 2022. The workers’ lawsuit demanded $5 million but the settlement details were not revealed in last week’s filings. Since the outage’s resolution, a number of lawsuits have been filed against UKG and employers who used its Kronos Private Cloud product alleging wage and hour violations. In one July 2022 class and collective action filing, a former employee of West Virginia University Medical alleged that WVU Medical failed to pay employees for hours worked, including overtime hours, during the outage. Months prior, a New York City transit employee made similar allegations against the city’s Metropolitan Transit Authority in putative collective action. Pepsi and its employees recently settled similar claims for nearly $13 million . The incident has led some observers to question the preparedness of HR vendors to defend themselves from targeted cyber crimes, as well as the potential for liability in the event of such attacks. Yet in previous interviews with HR Dive, organizations including UMass Memorial stated that they would not seek to split with UKG , with some stakeholders citing the vendor’s capabilities as a strength compared to alternatives. Recommended Reading